You can't make this stuff up
Dow Jones industrial average:
Closed September 10, 2001: 9,605.51
Closed September 11, 2009:

Dude ... you just blew my mind.
(h/t Eschaton commenter notaboomer)
Labels: 9/11, stock market
Keeping America's Wang™ safe for progressives (and snark) since 2004
Proprietor and Chief Snarkmeister: Sinfonian
That crazy liberal dude who spoke at the Pensacola Tea Party in 2009 and ended up on "Countdown with Keith Olbermann"
Dow Jones industrial average:

Labels: 9/11, stock market
So my mother is visiting for Christmas. You remember her, the wingnut? I mean, she's not as bad as my aunt, but everything's relative. Heh.
Labels: 9/11, Barack Obama, George W. Bush, John McCain, personal, terrorism
We haven't had a "Too Stupid to Breathe" here at Blast Off! in a while, so it's a good thing that Kenneth Pocsi of Palm Beach Gardens has come along to end the drought.
For the past 18 months or so we all have been subjected to, injected with and immersed in Barack Obama's vision of total change, no more business as usual, no more mistakes of the past and a fresh way of governing.Is it possible to be that dumb and still maintain basic life functions? Mr. Pocsi gives us enough evidence to answer that question in the affirmative.
But as I struggle to follow the news to get a preview of what the face of the new Washington is going to look like, I see nothing but Clinton retreads all over the place. I thought that liberals were supposed to be smarter than us conservative Republicans and that they have the ability to think more independently and more progressively than the rest of us. But behold, this new administration is shaping up like the old Dem-Lib ones of the past, those who in the '90s gave us higher taxes, fought against welfare reform, attempted socialized medicine and did nothing to protect us against the terrorists who planned the attacks in New York and at the Pentagon.
These are but a few lowlights of what I think we all have to look forward to again. Congratulations to all those who voted for this new visionary. You all wanted to make history. Well, you did. God help us all.
KENNETH POCSI
Palm Beach Gardens
Labels: 9/11, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush, Kenneth Pocsi, too stupid to breathe
Some deranged motherfucker is driving around south Florida these days in a huge pickup truck festooned with sick, deranged right-wing messages.
Sorry the photo quality isn't better (I only had my cell phone with me), but let me transcribe some of the more abhorrent (and less legible) messages for you:Labels: 9/11, Allen West, Barack Obama, Boca Raton, bumper stickers, George W. Bush, rant, wingnuts
Okay. It's the seventh anniversary of arguably the most tragic day in American history. I suppose I should say something about it.
Labels: 9/11, Eschaton, George W. Bush, John McCain, personal, Republicans, Wes Flinn
Wow. It's 9/11 again already?
Labels: 9/11, Rudy Giuliani, snark
Here's a little piece of Blast Off! Classic (I heard if you just add "Classic" to anything, it makes it all retro and nostalgic even though it's really old and hackneyed, e.g., ESPN Classic, Coke Classic, Huggy Bear Classic ... okay, maybe not that last one).
Often, we are encouraged to remember unpleasant events in our lives. Collectively, as Americans, we learn iconic messages from our history classes like "Remember the Alamo!" or "Remember the Maine!" We know that the memories of the devastation at Pearl Harbor motivated thousands, maybe even millions, to support American involvement in World War II and ultimately to win it.Labels: 9/11, George W. Bush, Iraq, neocons, PDB
Beginning at 12:01 pm on January 20, 2009, responsibility for every death and injury to an American soldier in Iraq and Afghanistan will rest with President Obama.
Labels: 9/11, Afghanistan, Barack Obama, Iraq, wingnuts
So long, Mr. 9/11. I'm posting this at 11:09 just for you, pal.
Labels: 9/11, Rudy Giuliani, schadenfreude
Chris Dodd, whose longshot bid for the presidency is in need of a boost, got just the opposite from Major League Baseball the other day:
Presidential candidate and U.S. Sen. Christopher Dodd says he'll still be cheering on the Boston Red Sox at Fenway Park, but without a randomly selected campaign donor by his side.To his credit, at least Dodd wasn't asking donors to chip in $9.11 like a certain other candidate I know ...
Major League Baseball officials warned the Connecticut Democrat this week that his plan to raffle two tickets to an American League Championship game -- in return for donations to his presidential campaign -- violates the organization's rules.
Dodd, a longtime Red Sox fan, offered a chance at the tickets to anyone who donated $20.04 to his campaign, an amount selected because the Sox last won the World Series in 2004. Supporters could also enter by recruiting two dozen like-minded voters to sign up on Dodd's campaign Web site.
But his office called off the raffle after MLB officials cried foul.
"This isn't quite Bucky Dent or Aaron Boone, but we are disappointed nonetheless," Dodd spokeswoman Colleen Flanagan said, referring to former New York Yankees sluggers whose home runs ended Red Sox playoff hopes.
The raffle winner would have received two tickets to Game 6 of the American League Championship series against the Cleveland Indians. If Game 6 is not necessary, the winner would have received tickets for Game 2 of the World Series instead.
There were two catches: The winner had to sit with Dodd at the game and, if the Red Sox were eliminated, the baseball tickets would be replaced with airfare to a Dodd campaign event in Iowa or New Hampshire.
Labels: 9/11, baseball, Chris Dodd, Rudy Giuliani
I really don't want to do a 9/11 post. Every blogger and his or her brother will be doing one, I imagine, and I don't really have anything to say about it. 9/11 was a horrific tragedy, but it didn't need to lead to the abuses of power that the Bush crime syndicate has inflicted upon us nearly every day since then.
There are lots of things you can do today.When you reflect today, as you should, reflect on these things. Then act.
You can tell them you really, really, really don't want to see a strike on Iran.
You can tell them that everybody knows that our presence in Iraq is the problem in Iraq.
You can ask them to do the simple exercise of remembering the last time they fed paper money into a change machine and it was rejected - did they then throw away the bill? Do they think we should trust a machine to count our votes?
You can tell them that you don't want machines owned by far-right Republicans counting our votes, or a media owned by conservatives to report on our politics, our issues, our candidates.
You can tell your Senators and Congressmen that Terwilliger, Olson, and Silberman are political hacks who are absolutely unacceptable choices for Attorney General.
You can even ask them how George Walker Bush and Richard Bruce Cheney allowed a successful attack on America on 9/11, and why nothing has been done about it.
You can tell them you don't want to vote for people who allow these things to happen.
Labels: 9/11, Avedon, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, meta
Often, we are encouraged to remember unpleasant events in our lives. Collectively, as Americans, we learn iconic messages from our history classes like "Remember the Alamo!" or "Remember the Maine!" We know that the memories of the devastation at Pearl Harbor motivated thousands, maybe even millions, to support American involvement in World War II and ultimately to win it.Labels: 9/11, George W. Bush, PDB
As the Bush crime syndicate does more and more grievous damage to our country and the world, as the war spirals ever farther into chaos, and as the GOP scandals mount, I continue to be baffled by the fact that even 30% of Americans (give or take a few, depending on the survey) still support Drunky McStagger and his minions.
I was never someone you could label and certainly never one to hold to a party line if I felt the party was wrong. Always a registered Democrat I vote based on conscience and not always Democrat. But I did vote for Bill Clinton twice and never regretted those votes - at least not until September 11. That day changed me irreversibly and had a profound impact on how I view politics.Note the classic concern troll tactic, addressing the supposed purity of having voted for Clinton (twice, even!!!!1!), but how that felt wrong on 9/11/2001 ... after Clinton had been out of office for almost eight months.
September 11 was a beautiful sunny day right after our end-of-summer Labor Day holiday. I had a neighborhood reunion 2 weeks prior which we have every five years. I renewed old ties with people including [childhood friend] who remembered that I taught him to swim the butterfly stroke. My office was on 57th Street and Third Avenue and across the hall from a major public relation firm. My son had just started his senior year at Duke University in economics and was looking forward to the litany of investment banking firm interviews in the Fall. Just before the holiday weekend I had to cancel a west coast trip because of a sudden meeting I had in New York that was more important. I was supposed to be on the American Airlines 9:00 AM flight out of JFK to Los Angeles.
As I was rushing downtown to meet my two friends who I had hoped got out of the World Trade Center I kept muttering (referring to Bill Clinton), "You SOB, you really did it now" over and over again. I was also thankful that my son was not a year older, because he could have been working for one of the investment banking firms in the WTC and would have been incinerated with others.Again with the Clenis™. Of course, if you're wondering how Clinton "really did it," well, you won't find it in this guy's twisted narrative.
My initial reaction ended up being right as I learned more and more information over time. The key learning came about a year ago as we were coming to the five year anniversary of 9/11 and I was on the Editorial Board of an old public policy magazine. We agreed to cover 9/11 differently and look to see if we are winning or losing which required having in-depth understanding of the development of these radical Islam groups, their intentions, and whether they are or are not achieving them.Get ready, now, kids, because we're about to conflate all Muslims in order to justify attacking Iraq in "retaliation" for 9/11. And we'll throw in a Hitler comparison just for kicks.
Wars are fought for political and ideological power and superiority. Wars are also defined by a series of battles that you would hope you lose some but win most as long as you achieve your desired objective.
We have been engaged in a war with a fascist form of Islam for decades. The "we" includes all forms of civilization other than this radical fundamentalist form of Islam. So it includes the USA, Europe (East and West), as well as all of Asia and the Pacific.
The enemy are all groups that have branched off the old Muslim Brotherhood from the 1920's which includes Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah. Some are Shia based and others are Sunni based. While they may hate each other, what they have in common is hatred for a common enemy which is us. Other than Iran, none are nation states and operate cross boundaries outside the bounds of conventional warfare and treaties. They use terror as their primary tactic to breakdown the will of the people and therefore the governments.
If you saw the movie Syriana it was a glimpse into the recruiting and indoctrination methods these groups have used for decades within the educational systems they created in all the Arab countries with the help of their host governments in exchange for the promise of allowing the host governments to continue their power.
Their goals are absolute rule in all Muslim countries and then the elimination of all modern western society. They are far more focused and committed to their cause than communists ever were. They are very smart, very resourceful, very well financed, and very, very patient. But they do believe their time is now.
It is a mistake for any political leader not to believe in what they write and preach. We have already learned that lesson.
[...]
What should not been in doubt since 9/11 are that there is a war between all radical Muslim groups and us. It has been called a clash of cultures, but that dismisses the political aspects of this. As did the various fascists groups in the 1930's these Islamic fascist groups also want ultimate power and are fanatical enough to stop at nothing to achieve their goals. As with Hitler, they cannot be negotiated with or appeased. They actually view appeasement as a sign of weakness and will use it against their enemies. And as in the lead up to World War II the blame for everything centered in Jews.
When it comes to this War, President Bush's moves and adjustments were necessary, proper, and lawful. The U.S. had (and may still have) Al Qaeda and Hezbollah sleeper cells within our boundaries. They were cells that were still being financed through international means. And there were countries and leaders that harboring them, training them, and supporting them. Bush was dealing with a dismantled CIA and FBI as well as a greatly reduced military because we thought the war (Cold War) was over and were in a false sense of security.Jeebus, the sweeping generalizations here boggle the mind. Moreover, in neither paragraph did I see a mention of Iraq -- somehow the war against Iraq is "necessary, proper, and lawful" based on the alleged existence of al Qaeda and Hezbollah in the U.S.? I thought we were fighting them there so we didn't have to fight them here? Assuming they are "there" at all, I mean.
The Patriot Act was necessary in order to infiltrate all of the Muslims groups in this country and determine who were threats. In spite of all the protests there is not a single shred of evidence of someone's civil right being violated with the Patriot Act. The NSA program of listening in on overseas telephone conversations from known terror suspects was also necessary. Again, in spite of charges being made there is not a single shred of evidence that this program was abused and violated anyone's civil rights. The Swift program was necessary to track down the money trail leading to these terror groups. And again, in spite of charges of invading people's bank records there is not a shred of evidence that anyone's rights were violated. The net result was the U.S. was able to rapidly round up terror suspects in the U.S. (and hopefully those bastards that were dancing in celebration in Paterson [New Jersey]) and ship them down to Gitmo. There has also been successful worldwide coordination of intelligence to break other potential attacks, particularly after Madrid and London.
Was it a mistake to invade Iraq? As I said the Middle East was the nest for this fascist Islam and its propagation. It was a self-feeding system that had to be broken. I agreed, as did nearly everyone in this country, that the invasion to take out Hussein was correct. But the war was fought on a shoe-string and accomplished nothing more than deposing Hussein. There should have been forces to immediately close off the borders to Syria and Iran and through saber rattling threatened to go further if they interfered. That was not done. In addition, they disbanded Hussein's military and police rather than give them the chance to switch sides and thereby secure the country immediately. Those were two enormous mistakes that have cost thousands of American lives.Okay, first of all, "usurping the Constitution" is illegal per se. You can't sugarcoat it and you can't justify it -- for anything. That's why we have a Constitution in the first place, you moron!
For those that criticize the Bush administration for usurping the Constitution and our laws with their efforts to secure this country I would say, "Prove it" because other than hyperbole and insinuations there has been no credible evidence of so-called "lying."
For those, like Hillary Clinton, that have conveniently switched sides on the Iraq issue by revealing, "If I knew then what I know now," they should understand that a President does not get do-overs. A President must have the clarity to make a decision, the conviction of that decision, and the courage to see that decision through. That disqualifies Hillary Clinton as a qualified candidate for President.Bob freaking Kerrey? This writer is delusional, seriously. As in he needs medical attention.
Edwards idiot pronouncement that "the war on terror is just a bumper sticker slogan" is further proof of his superficial used-car sales mentality when it comes to politics. Obama is just not qualified enough yet.
When you listen to the Republican debates your heard a number of their candidates clearly define this war against radical Islam, while not a single Democrat could (or would) define it.
Frankly the only qualified candidate the Democrats have is not running and that would be former Senator Bob Kerrey who is a highly decorated former Navy Seal and was on the 9/11 Commission.
When the founding fathers finally created the form of federal government we have now, they envisioned the primarily role of the President as the commander-in-chief to lead the army against outside enemies. In that role Bill Clinton was a failure and G.W. Bush has done his job. And that is why whenever the American people choose a President during a time of war they never elect an anti-war candidate.There you have it, folks: a perspective completely divorced from reality, ignoring clear facts and selectively reporting history in a distorted manner to prop up a failed president and a dying ideology.
September 11 was a wake-up call. While some Americans have fallen back to sleep into some sort of state of denial, fortunately most Americans do understand that we are in danger and at war beyond Iraq.
Labels: 9/11, Bill Clinton, Bob Kerrey, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, John Edwards, rant, Republicans, Rush Limbaugh
Wow -- see what happens when I'm in a meeting for the afternoon and away from the news?
The Rev. Jerry Falwell, the television evangelist who founded the Moral Majority and used it to mold the religious right into a political force, died Tuesday shortly after being found unconscious in his office at Liberty University. He was 73.Atrios makes some great points about Falwell's opinions during his life. Who can forget Falwell's immortal words, "AIDS is not just God's punishment for homosexuals; it is God's punishment for the society that tolerates homosexuals"?
Television evangelists Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, two of the most prominent voices of the religious right, said liberal civil liberties groups, feminists, homosexuals and abortion rights supporters bear partial responsibility for Tuesday's terrorist attacks because their actions have turned God's anger against America.And now, of course, he presumably knows (or knew) ... the rest of the story.
"God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve," said Falwell, appearing yesterday on the Christian Broadcasting Network's "700 Club," hosted by Robertson.
"Jerry, that's my feeling," Robertson responded. "I think we've just seen the antechamber to terror. We haven't even begun to see what they can do to the major population."
Falwell said the American Civil Liberties Union has "got to take a lot of blame for this," again winning Robertson's agreement: "Well, yes."
Then Falwell broadened his blast to include the federal courts and others who he said were "throwing God out of the public square." He added: "The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way -- all of them who have tried to secularize America -- I point the finger in their face and say, 'You helped this happen.' "
Sen. John McCain, [Liberty University's] commencement speaker last year, said Tuesday that his prayers were with Falwell's family.STFU, Saint John.
"Dr. Falwell was a man of distinguished accomplishment who devoted his life to serving his faith and country," McCain said.
Labels: 9/11, ACLU, AIDS, gay rights, Jerry Falwell, John McCain, obituary, Pat Robertson
Too bad I already bestowed today's Daily Schadenfreude award on Newt Gingrich, because a fellow GOP presidential hopeful has more problems of his own.
One of the nation's largest firefighters' union has accused Republican presidential contender Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor, of committing "egregious acts" against firefighters who died in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.It's really quite humorous to watch the Repukes try to find a candidate that isn't an utter disaster. Let's see ...
The International Association of Fire Fighters, in a draft letter, excoriated Giuliani for his November 2001 decision to cut back the number of firefighters searching the rubble of Ground Zero for the remains of some 300 fallen comrades.
The 280,000-member union accused him of expediting the clean-up process with a "scoop-and-dump" operation after the recovery of millions of dollars in gold, silver and other assets from the Bank of Nova Scotia that had been buried.
Labels: 2008, 9/11, Duncan Hunter, John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Republicans, Rudy Giuliani, Sam Brownback, schadenfreude, Tom Tancredo