What's wrong with me? I haven't had a Daily
Schadenfreude on here in forever! Maybe I was just waiting for a good one. And this is a
very good one.

You remember Sen. Ronda Storms (right), don't you? The batshit crazy wingnut from the Tampa area had
introduced legislation to try to get creationism into Florida's public schools. Well, today the bill came to the floor for debate. And Sen. Storms
got her ass handed to her publicly.
The first tactic by the Democrats was brilliant. They pointed out that if teachers were made to teach "the full range of scientific views" about evolution, including intelligent design, then they also must teach "the full range of scientific views" about human sexuality, including contraception. Right?! Come on, now ... help me, Ronda:
Republican Sen. Ronda Storms said that Democratic proposal went too far and had it voted down on the Senate floor Thursday, saying the sex-ed measure not only didn't belong on her evolution bill but that it could lead to "prematurely deflowering kindergart[e]ners and first- and second-graders."
Sen. [Ted] Deutch, a Boca Raton Democrat, countered that the sex-education bill had to be "age appropriate" and that it would help stop venereal disease and unwanted pregnancies.
Adapting Storm's [sic] language in previous debates, Duetch [sic] said the bill simply gives students "the opportunity to ask about the scientific information."
From there, the debate over the measure, which could be voted out of the chamber by next week, became tense.
After trying to show that Storms, a Christian conservative, is only concerned with "academic freedom" when it comes to evolution, [Democrats] tried to cast doubt on her proposal as a backdoor way of teaching Intelligent Design, which a Pennsylvania federal court in 2005 banned from the science classroom as being too theistic.
Deflowering kindergarteners? Oh,
please. Storms has to be the stupidest person ever elected to any legislature anywhere. Okay, except for Jim Inhofe. But I digress ...
Smartly and shrewdly, the Dems wouldn't let up in what the reporter described as "tense" debate:
So Democrats repeatedly asked: Could teachers teach Intelligent Design under the Academic Freedom bill? Ronda Storms wouldn't say yes or no.
Her answer, instead, came straight from the text of her bill that Democrats were trying to tear apart as backdoor Creationism: "You may teach, specifically: 'scientific information relevant to the full range of scientific views regarding biological and chemical evolution in connection with teaching any prescribed curriculum regarding chemical or biological evolution.' "
Storms at one point added: "The bottom line is if it is not scientifically based and if it is not scientifically relevant, the answer is no. If it is, the answer is yes."
She also pointed out that the bill says "you may not teach religious doctrine." When pressed about Intelligent Design by Democratic Sen. Nan Rich of Sunrise, Storms said "asked and answered."
But it wasn't, said Democratic leader Steve Geller of Cooper City. When he started to ask her personal view about Intelligent Design, Republican Senate President Ken Pruitt of Port St. Lucie interrupted: "Sen. Storms, you don't have to answer this if you don't want to."
Geller continued: "Do you believe Intelligent Design meets the criteria in your bill," which says scientific information is "germane current facts, data and peer-reviewed research."
Said Storms: "I absolutely believe that evolution should be taught in public schools. I also believe that we should teach the full range of critical analysis of evolution."
It's well past time that we stopped taking morons like Storms seriously. Part of the problem, I think, is that we on the Left have been too quick to legitimize positions that are just idiotic by opposing them as though they have merit. It's far more effective, and certainly in this instance far more appropriate, to treat such things with the
derision and ridicule they deserve.
Speaking of derision and ridicule, check out what happened when Storms was asked to produce the people she claims have been "afraid" to contradict the new state science standards mandating the teaching of evolution:
Storms said her bill was designed to counteract the "dogmatic" new state science standards requiring for the first time evolution to be and that "people are afraid. Teachers are afraid. And students, by the way, are afraid."
Geller objected, noting her bill says the "Legislature finds that in many instances" teachers and students have feared or been disciplined for teaching the full range of scientific information about evolution.
When Geller asked her for names, Storms didn't have any but said six educators who planned to talk on the topic recently weren't given the time to address a recent Senate committee.
Jeebus. Look, I'm not going to go so far as to say that Ronda Storms is too stupid to breathe. But she's surely too stupid to serve in the state Senate. Or maybe the constituents who voted for her are the stupid ones.
The good news, though, Ronda, is that you're
not too stupid to earn a little
Blast Off!-style derision and ridicule of your own: congratulations, because today's
Blast Off! Daily
Schadenfreude is for you!
Labels: evolution, Florida, Ronda Storms, schadenfreude, Senate