Florida is at risk of going from America's Wang™ to America's Black Sheep in short order.
The national Democratic Party has
threatened to refuse Florida its 210 delegates to next summer's national convention of the state goes ahead with plans to hold its presidential primary on January 29, 2008, a week ahead of the party's February 5 threshold for all states other than Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.
If not, the state's 4 million Democrats could be left with no say in the selection of the party's presidential nominee next year. However, a candidate with enough delegates to win the nomination could ask that Florida's delegates be seated at the convention in the interest of party unity.
"It's going to be a difficult discussion," Thurman said of the meetings she plans to have in the coming days with fellow Democrats in Florida.
On the eve of Saturday's committee meeting, Bill Nelson, the state's senior U.S. senator, had threatened legal action if the DNC imposed sanctions against Florida over the 2008 presidential primary.
But DNC officials Saturday cited legal precedents allowing a political party to establish its rules. "We set our rules," said longtime DNC member Donna Brazile.
You might be asking yourself, "How could something like this happen?" You probably won't be surprised at the answer:
In her testimony to the rules committee Saturday, Thurman said the Republican-controlled Florida Legislature ignored Democratic Party rules in pushing through the law that moved the state's primary into the pre-Feb. 5 window.
She repeatedly insisted that Florida Democrats undertook "provable, positive steps" at every stage of the legislative process to prevent GOP leaders in Tallahassee from moving the primary to Jan. 29.
What we have here is a failure to communicate ...
The problem for me is that I can see both sides, and I'm not really sure where my opinion falls. On the one hand, I acknowledge the party's interest in allowing a geographically-diverse cross-section of smaller states take the lead, in order to give lesser-known and -financed candidates a better shot. However, as a Floridian, I agree with Thurman and others that a move of the primary off of the January 29 date could deal a serious if not fatal blow to the down-ticket items on the ballot, especially the
highly controversial taxation proposal.
Moreover, I'd say to the party, what difference does a week really make? Iowa, Nevada, and New Hampshire all are scheduled before January 29 (the 14th, 19th, and 22nd, respectively), and South Carolina is set for the same day. Is it really so heinous to allow Florida to move up? And what about Michigan, where party officials are
pushing for a January 15 date?
The Republicans who control Florida's legislature knew exactly what they were doing when they proposed the January 29 date for primaries. They knew it would piss off the Democratic Party and create dissension in the ranks just when the Democrats need to be most organized. So, here we are, facing another situation where the Republicans have out-strategized us. And now we have to deal with the consequences.
I'd just tell -- okay,
beg -- Karen Thurman and Florida Democrats to work out a compromise. It's not worth risking 2008, not to mention the inevitable media maelstrom if Florida can't participate fully in the convention, just to have our primary on January 29. But ultimately, I hope the national party recognizes that they can give up a week's ground in the interest of keeping a naturally fractious process as stable as possible ... and in turn, managing to appease a powerful and critical swing state.
UPDATE (1:28 pm 8/26/07): You know, the Republicans are facing the
same kind of sanction (Google cache only; not available anymore on the
Orlando Sentinel's website) from their national party. Wonder why we never hear about that? Hmmm ....
(h/t
V for Virginia)
Labels: Democrats, Florida, Florida Democratic Party, Florida legislature, Karen Thurman, primary, Republicans